shots fired


You better tell somebody! Shiit!!

Let’s see what the xenophobes and racists say about THIS^^^



I’m resigning.

well damn
posted at 4:36 pm on Wednesday
with 22,241 notes / reblog
posted at 2:55 pm on Wednesday
with 41,160 notes / reblog
posted at 2:00 pm on Wednesday
with 6,799 notes / reblog

I’ve been called naughty because of my glasses about five times tonight


The End of a Dream - Giuseppe Pennasilico
posted at 7:35 pm on Tuesday
with 211 notes / reblog




pick a random 7 year old mexican boy and 35 year old mexican man i bet 50$ they the same height

why do ugly bitches always got ugly opinions lmao

i am genetically male and I’m about 6’3” and I have family members taller than me

u shoulda…

1. learn the difference between ethnicity/nationality/race before you make another post 

2. since ur puerto rican, mexican culture/people are not yours to joke about.

3. bye

my body has decided that today is a “watch a whole season of this cool new show in bed” kind of day

posted at 5:56 pm on Tuesday
with 2,537 notes / reblog
posted at 4:48 pm on Tuesday
with 21,289 notes / reblog
posted at 3:10 pm on Tuesday
with 7,468 notes / reblog
posted at 2:36 pm on Tuesday
with 707 notes / reblog
posted at 1:01 am on Tuesday
with 192 notes / reblog
posted at 12:35 am on Tuesday
with 126,762 notes / reblog

Women Prisoners Sterilized To Cut Welfare Cost In California
In California, prison doctors have sterilized at least 148 women, mainly Mexicans, from 2006 to 2010. Why? They don’t want to have to provide welfare funding for any children they may have in the future and to eliminate ‘defectives’ from the gene pool.
The sterilization procedures cost California taxpayers $147,460 between 1997 and 2010. The doctors at the prison argue it is money well-spent.
Dr. James Heinrich, an OB-GYN at Valley State Prison for Women, said, “Over a 10-year period, that isn’t a huge amount of money compared to what you save in welfare paying for these unwanted children – as they procreated more.”
In 1909, California passed the country’s third sterilization law, authorizing reproductive surgeries of patients committed to state institutions for the “feebleminded” and “insane” that were deemed suffering from a “mental disease which may have been inherited and is likely to be transmitted to descendants.” Based on this eugenic logic, 20,000 patients in more than ten institutions were sterilized in California from 1909 to 1979. Worried about charges of “cruel and unusual punishment,” legislators attached significant provisions to sterilization in state prisons. Despite these restrictions, about 600 men received vasectomies at San Quentin in the 1930s when the superintendent flaunted the law.
Moreover, there was a discernible racial bias in the state’s sterilization and eugenics programs. Preliminary research on a subset of 15,000 sterilization orders in institutions (conducted by Stern and Natalie Lira) suggests that Spanish-surnamed patients, predominantly of Mexican origin, were sterilized at rates ranging from 20 to 30 percent from 1922 to 1952, far surpassing their proportion of the general population.
In her recent book, Miroslava Chávez-García shows, through exhaustively researched stories of youth of color who were institutionalized in state reformatories, and sometimes subsequently sterilized, how eugenic racism harmed California’s youngest generation in patterns all too reminiscent of detention and incarceration today. California was the most zealous sterilizer, carrying out one-third of the approximately 60,000 operations performed in the 32 states that passed eugenic sterilization laws from 1907 to 1937.
Although such procedures may seem harsh, they are not illegal. The Supreme Court ruled in 1927 that women can be forcibly sterilized in jail in Buck vs Bell. Writing for the majority, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. said, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
posted at 12:07 am on Tuesday
with 11,036 notes / reblog

My upload xo
posted at 4:27 pm on Monday
with 694 notes / reblog